View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
awwtw
Joined: Apr 06 2008 Posts: 7 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject: Re: Certificate |
|
|
Thanks for the fast reply, guys.
As is the Army way, this form was done in triplicate. I have two signed and stamped copies, and I'm sure the Army kept the third.
I'm attaching some photos I've taken of my rifle.
My dad said that at the end of the war, some of the older soldiers on Okinawa were selling these rifles to new arrivals for $100 each. So he and a buddy broke into a munitions dump where there were thousands of Japanese rifles, grabbed ten rifles each, and gave all but this one to newbies for free. This didn't make him popular with the older guys, but the new arrivals loved it.
I wonder what happened to all those rifles in the dump...
Trey, I've been filling out your data sheet on this rifle, but I have a few questions. What is the difference between a wide metal buttplate and a thin metal buttplate other than the obvious? Mine is just over a quarter inch wide at the top and one-half inch at the bottom. The inspection mark just to the right of the Nagoya mark on the receiver appears to be either a partial strike or a mark not shown on your form.
Anyway, thanks for the forum.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gwsiii
Joined: Aug 21 2003 Posts: 2240 Location: Hayden, AL
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: rifle |
|
|
Very nice rifle, and great history on it!
Your rifle is a 4th series, so it has the type 'A' wide butt plate. The
'B' thin butt plate is found on 7th and 9th series rifles. The mark to the right of the Nagoya Arsenal mark is the 'Na' mark, if it were fully stamped you'd recognize it as inspection mark N1 on the old datasheet, inspection mark A on the 2006 dated revision. I'll try and post some pictures of the two butt plates in the morning. Trey _________________ Subscribe to BANZAI!
Fill out a Japanese Rifle Datasheet.
I didn't pay to much for that old Arisaka, I just bought it a little bit too soon! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seinen
Joined: Aug 24 2003 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
awwtw,
Can you ask your dad about when (where) the mum was ground?
C/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
awwtw
Joined: Apr 06 2008 Posts: 7 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
He said that all of the rifles at the dump had their mums ground. He arrived on the island after the surrender and most of the weapons were already gathered up. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seinen
Joined: Aug 24 2003 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
awwtw wrote: | He said that all of the rifles at the dump had their mums ground. He arrived on the island after the surrender and most of the weapons were already gathered up. |
Interesting. Leads one to believe that perhaps the Americans did the grinding, as opposed to captured Japanese troops.
C/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
awwtw
Joined: Apr 06 2008 Posts: 7 Location: Alaska
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Seinen,
I asked my dad about that, and he doesn't know for sure, but he had always presumed that US soldiers had ground the mums. He admitted though, that it would have been possible that Japanese POW's had done it, as there were a number of them in custody.
These POW's he says, were greatly surprised at being treated so well by the Americans; they had been told that we were going to kill and eat them!
Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seinen
Joined: Aug 24 2003 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
awwtw wrote: | I asked my dad about that, and he doesn't know for sure, but he had always presumed that US soldiers had ground the mums. He admitted though, that it would have been possible that Japanese POW's had done it, as there were a number of them in custody. |
I based my conjecture on the fact that there were likely a lot more US soldiers present than Japanese POWs. Guess it's another mystery. Please extend my thanks to your for answering our questions.
C/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|