 |
Japanese Militaria at Castle-Thunder.com An information board for the Collector of Nippon Militaria
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:57 pm Post subject: My first Type 99 |
|
|
Well, I finally got enough sun yesterday afternoon to get a tolerable picture of my "entire" Japanese rifle collection. Ha-ha! My first and only (thus far) Japanese rifle. My "overall' picture didn't turn out as expected, so I'll try one of those later, but I thought I would start with these.
 _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: clearly, I need more practice! |
|
|
Anyway, that's what I think is Series 23, as best as I can make out.
The mum is "munged" up, though you can still tell what it is. Not completely ground off, in any case. _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: details |
|
|
Sorry, I left out the best parts. This is an all matching rifle. At least, I think it is. The safety is numbered 108, and the bolt is also, at the root of the handle. The extractor does not seem to have a number. Is that right? I've seen some others where they were numbered on the end. Also, the firing pin is numbered 108, but it's on the side of the tab (sorry, I don't know what else to call it) that sticks out, rather than on the side of the round part. Is that normal? The bayonet lug is also 108, though a little bit rusty up there.
It has a monopod, though it's a bit bent, rather than perfectly straight. The middle band is missing the swivel. Any idea where I might find the correct version of that? It seems to have had a dust cover at one time, judging by the bluing of the receiver, which seems to show some wear there. Which of you has that? Anyway, I'm getting geared up to shoot it, but brass seems as expensive as loaded ammunition, so I'm planning to buy some of Mr. Nambu's shortly.
I'll post a couple more pics, if these aren't too big. _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seinen
Joined: Aug 24 2003 Posts: 115
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:46 pm Post subject: Re: clearly, I need more practice! |
|
|
Garandshtr wrote: | Anyway, that's what I think is Series 23, as best as I can make out.
The mum is "munged" up, though you can still tell what it is. Not completely ground off, in any case. |
Yep, it's a 23rd Series.
C/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: couple more pics |
|
|
Just for fun.
 _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Any one direct me to a replacement swivel?
 _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
03man
Joined: Jul 30 2005 Posts: 131 Location: Denver, NC
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You will probably have to buy a complete band and remove the swive.
Someone here may have a spare, I'm all out. _________________ 03man |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Rockhill
Joined: Jan 09 2006 Posts: 58 Location: SE Pennsylannia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:56 pm Post subject: Re: details |
|
|
Garandshtr wrote: | The extractor does not seem to have a number. Is that right? |
That is correct, it should not be numbered. Kokura only numbered the extractors for the bulk of the 20th series (thats another story), then stopped for the rest of production. The only marks will be a kokura inspection stamps, in this case 2nd factory, on the back side of the extractor. _________________ Fat, Drunk,and Stupid is no way to go through life son. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:12 pm Post subject: thanks Mike! |
|
|
Thanks for the info on the extractor. So far, so good!
Any takers on the numbering of the firing pin? _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Rockhill
Joined: Jan 09 2006 Posts: 58 Location: SE Pennsylannia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry I missed the fact that you were questioning that. Yes that is also correct and that style of numbering the pin is also specific to kokura arsenal. I know they did it that way on the early rifles, but cannot say for sure when they changed to numbering on the body of the pin like everyone else, probably in the 24th series. I will check to see if I have any info on that change over.
While I am at it I might also add that kokura monopods, for some reason, are quite often found bent up. Not sure if they spec'd a different treatment or grade of metal for the monopod, but in my experience if you see a rifle at a distance and its pod is tweeked 9 out of 10 times its kokura.
I am not sure what to say about the swivel. Your best bet is to replace the entire rear band. the swivel was first fitted to the swivel boss on the side of the band and then a rivet was popped into the boss to prevent the swivel from coming out by traveling too far in either direction. _________________ Fat, Drunk,and Stupid is no way to go through life son. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Garandshtr
Joined: Dec 27 2007 Posts: 109 Location: Palm Harbor, FL
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 4:50 pm Post subject: Thanks Mike! |
|
|
Mike Rockhill wrote: |
...
I am not sure what to say about the swivel. Your best bet is to replace the entire rear band. the swivel was first fitted to the swivel boss on the side of the band and then a rivet was popped into the boss to prevent the swivel from coming out by traveling too far in either direction. |
Thanks for the input, Mike!
Bummer about the rear band though. I guess I'll have to keep an eye open. Would a correct one would have a mark from inspection on it? I think, remembering from the data sheet, there should be an inspection mark of some sort on that part. I don't think I was able to verify that, since I couldn't make out one. Maybe it's not a big deal anyway. I hadn't even noticed it was missing until I was filling out the data sheet! _________________ Still trying to learn what I can, mainly about the Type 99 and Type 38. I have more curiosity than time, and more time than money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|